Can AI help me reduce subjective opinions in my thesis?

Artificial intelligence tools can assist in reducing subjective bias within academic writing, including theses, by providing objective language analysis and evidence-focused recommendations. Key AI functionalities include detecting emotionally charged vocabulary, sweeping generalizations, and unsupported claims, highlighting areas where opinion may overshadow evidence. These systems analyze writing patterns against formal academic standards and vast corpora of neutral texts to suggest more precise, factual phrasing. However, human oversight remains crucial to contextualize AI feedback, discern complex disciplinary nuances, and ensure the writer's critical perspective is articulated appropriately without undue bias. AI functions best as a supplementary tool for enhancing objectivity, not replacing scholarly interpretation. To implement this, researchers can utilize AI-powered grammar/style checkers equipped with bias detection during manuscript revisions. The process involves: inputting thesis drafts into the tool; carefully reviewing AI flags concerning potentially subjective language; critically evaluating the context of each suggestion; replacing biased expressions with evidence-based statements or quantifying subjective claims where valid; and iteratively refining the text. This improves methodological transparency, strengthens argument credibility, and ensures claims are verifiable, thereby bolstering the thesis's scholarly value.