How can the quality of an article be ensured through the publication process of a journal?

Ensuring article quality throughout journal publication relies primarily on rigorous peer review, where independent experts critically evaluate submissions for validity, significance, originality, and clarity. This structured process, managed by editors, is the cornerstone of scholarly quality control. Key mechanisms include robust editorial screening to reject unsuitable manuscripts early; thorough peer assessment by qualified specialists focusing on methodological soundness, contribution to the field, and ethical compliance; and adherence to established publishing ethics guidelines. Authors must transparently address reviewer critiques and editorial decisions during mandatory revisions. The quality assurance depends critically on selecting competent reviewers with relevant expertise and ensuring the process remains objective. The implementation involves distinct phases: initial technical and scope checks by editors; anonymous peer review, typically involving multiple experts; editorial decision based on reviewer recommendations (accept, revise, reject); and iterative author revisions until acceptance criteria are met. This meticulous workflow enhances manuscript robustness, safeguards research integrity, upholds disciplinary standards, and builds trust in published research within the academic community.