Some pairings worsen disease, and the lungs show why
The most studied dangerous partnership is influenza plus bacteria, which the review links to severe illness and death during both pandemic and seasonal flu seasons [2]. The proposed explanation is not that influenza hands bacteria a ride, but that the immune system's antibacterial defenses falter while the two pathogens act in concert [2].
Influenza also pairs badly with another respiratory virus. Hamsters infected with both SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A lost more weight and developed more severe, longer-lasting pneumonia than those given either virus alone. Interestingly, each virus still spread efficiently through the lungs without blocking the other, yet the two were not found in the same tissue sites—hinting they prefer different cells or that each limits the other locally. The co-infected animals also had markedly higher levels of the inflammatory signal IL-6 in their blood, which the authors suggest may contribute to the worse pneumonia [3]. That last point is offered as a possible mechanism, not a settled cause.
Sometimes the other infection protects instead of harms
Co-infection is not automatically bad news. In mice with a chronic gut infection by the helminth Heligmosomoides polygyrus bakeri, a later lethal dose of influenza virus produced better survival and less weight loss than in worm-free mice. Before influenza arrived, the worm-infected mice already had more effector CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in their airways and higher levels of type I interferons and inflammatory cytokines in lung tissue. After infection, viral titers were lower and virus-specific antibody and cellular responses were higher, with less cellular infiltration into the lung [1]. The authors describe this as "bystander" protection—a pre-existing immune state in the lung that happens to be hostile to influenza.
This is a mouse result with a specific worm and a specific timing of chronic infection, so it should not be read as advice about human worm infections. It does show that the direction of a co-infection's effect depends on which partner arrives first and what immune state it leaves behind—the same lesson the Streptococcus suis ordering experiment teaches from the opposite direction [1][4].
Influenza can also co-infect itself, with consequences for new strains
The other infectors need not be different species. When two influenza strains infect the same cell, their genetic segments can mix—a process called reassortment, which is how pandemic strains are thought to arise. A recent study using two fluorescently labeled divergent viruses found that pre-existing antibodies changed the mix of reassortant viruses produced and reduced the release of new virus particles from co-infected cells, both in lab dishes and in mice. Notably, a strain-specific neutralizing antibody actively promoted antigenic shift—the emergence of viruses with new surface proteins—whereas broadly cross-reactive antibodies that recognize many subtypes did not [5].
That finding is about the immune environment shaping which reassortants succeed, not about influenza carrying a passenger. But it rounds out the picture: influenza's capacity to combine with other infectors includes combining with other influenza viruses, and the host's own antibody history helps decide the result [5].
Sources used in this answer
Enteric helminth infection confers protection against lethal respiratory influenza virus infection
Mice chronically infected with an enteric helminth showed increased survival and reduced weight loss after lethal influenza infection, with lower viral titers and stronger antiviral immune responses, suggesting bystander protection.
Mechanisms of Severe Mortality-Associated Bacterial Co-infections Following Influenza Virus Infection
Influenza-associated bacterial co-infections contribute to severe disease and mortality, driven mainly by failure of antibacterial immunity and pathogen synergy.
Co-infection of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza virus causes more severe and prolonged pneumonia in hamsters
Hamsters co-infected with SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A virus developed more severe and prolonged pneumonia, with elevated IL-6, although the two viruses were not detected at the same tissue sites.
Pre-exposure to Streptococcus suis improved survival of influenza virus co-infection in mice
In mice, the order of influenza virus and Streptococcus suis infection changed outcomes: bacteria after virus worsened and accelerated death, while bacteria before virus reduced mortality compared with virus alone.
Subtype-specific neutralizing antibodies promote antigenic shift during influenza virus co-infection.
Preexisting strain-specific neutralizing antibodies promoted antigenic shift during influenza co-infection, whereas broadly cross-reactive antibodies did not.
