Decoding the Digital Heartbeat: Which Emotional Brand Values Drive Tourism Engagement?

Which emotional brand values do my followers want to hear about? An investigation of popular European tourist destinations

2018-12-05
Lidija Lalicic, Assumpció Huertas, Antonio Moreno, Mohammed Jabreel
Summary
Problem
Method
Results
Takeaways
Abstract

This study investigates the communication of European destination brands through Twitter and Facebook, focusing on emotional adjectives. By analyzing over 21,000 posts from top DMOs using Aaker’s brand personality scale, it identifies specific "effective values" that maximize user engagement across different platforms.

Executive Summary

TL;DR: In the hyper-competitive landscape of European tourism, "what" you say matters less than "how" you make followers feel. This research analyzes 15,000+ tweets and 6,000+ Facebook posts from 10 top European destinations to prove that DMOs (Destination Management Organizations) are often shouting into the void with the wrong emotional adjectives. By aligning brand values with platform-specific user psychology—moving from "glamour" to "happiness" on Twitter, or from "tradition" to "getaway" on Facebook—destinations can drastically amplify their digital reach.

Positioning: This work moves beyond simple activity metrics to provide a granular, Aaker-based semantic mapping of "effective" vs. "ineffective" emotional values in digital place branding.

The "Functional" Trap: Why DMOs are Missing the Mark

Most tourism marketing traditionally focuses on the functional: "We have a museum," or "The beach is sunny." However, digital users are seeking Self-Congruity—they follow brands that reflect who they are or who they want to be.

The authors identify a critical "Identity-Image Gap." DMOs often guess which emotional values appeal to their audience, leading to a mismatch where a destination’s self-promotion (Identity) fails to resonate with the user's perception (Image). The result? High posting frequency but low engagement.

Methodology: Semantic Mapping of Emotions

The researchers didn't just count keywords; they used Natural Language Processing (NLP) and the Wu-Palmer similarity measure to calculate the distance between adjectives used in posts and Aaker’s (1997) Brand Personality dimensions:

  1. Sincerity: (e.g., Honest, Wholesome)
  2. Excitement: (e.g., Trendy, Daring)
  3. Competence: (e.g., Reliable, Innovative)
  4. Sophistication: (e.g., Glamorous, Romantic)
  5. Ruggedness: (e.g., Outdoorsy, Tough)

Twitter Performance by Destination Table 1: Twitter engagement metrics highlighting the massive gap between activity (tweets) and impact (retweets per tweet).

Core Findings: The Platform Divide

Twitter: The Land of Sentiment and Sincerity

While DMOs loved using "Glamorous" and "Fresh" on Twitter, these were not the values that went viral. The highest Retweet Ratios came from:

  • Effective: Real, Sentimental, Happiness (Sincerity dimension).
  • Ineffective: Ambitious, Magical, Hospitable.

Facebook: Seeking Excitement and Escape

On Facebook, the "Like" reigned supreme, but the triggers were different. While "Honest" and "Traditional" were the most communicated, they weren't the most loved.

  • Effective: Getaway, Tough, Young (Ruggedness/Excitement dimensions).
  • Warning: Adjectives like "Down-to-earth" or "Family-oriented" actually correlated with higher "Angry" reactions (though not statistically significant, the trend suggests a clash with the 'escapist' nature of the platform).

Comparison of Emotional Values Table 2: Mapping DMO communication against actual user 'Impact' on Twitter shows that Sincerity is the undisputed king of retweets.

Deep Insight: Why Why This Works

The study reveals a psychological divergence in platform usage:

  • Twitter acts as a "Social Mirror." Users retweet values like "Happiness" and "Realness" because it reflects a curated, sincere persona to their professional and social circles.
  • Facebook acts as a "Mood Board." Users "Like" the idea of a "Getaway" or "Vitality" as a form of aspirational escapism.

Conclusion & Strategic Takeaways

Key Lesson: Stop using a "one-size-fits-all" emotional vocabulary.

  • For Twitter: Focus on the human element. Be "Real" and "Sentimental."
  • For Facebook: Sell the "Escape." Be "Young" and "Exciting."

Limitations: The study primarily focused on English-language posts and didn't account for the visual impact of photos—a critical next step for researchers looking to combine Computer Vision with Sentiment Analysis in tourism.

Future Outlook: As AI-driven sentiment analysis becomes more accessible, DMOs will likely transition to "Dynamic Emotional Branding," where post adjectives are adjusted in real-time based on trending user sentiments to maximize the "Identity-Image" fit.

Find Similar Papers

Try Our Examples

  • Search for recent studies that utilize Aaker’s brand personality scale to analyze Destination Management Organizations (DMOs) on Instagram or TikTok.
  • Identify the primary research that established the "identity-image gap" in tourism marketing and how later works have quantified this gap using Big Data.
  • Look for papers exploring the impact of multi-modal content (combining emotional text with specific imagery) on user engagement rates in social media marketing.
Contents
Decoding the Digital Heartbeat: Which Emotional Brand Values Drive Tourism Engagement?
1. Executive Summary
2. The "Functional" Trap: Why DMOs are Missing the Mark
3. Methodology: Semantic Mapping of Emotions
4. Core Findings: The Platform Divide
4.1. Twitter: The Land of Sentiment and Sincerity
4.2. Facebook: Seeking Excitement and Escape
5. Deep Insight: Why Why This Works
6. Conclusion & Strategic Takeaways