How to communicate with journal editors regarding the review feedback of articles?

Communicating with journal editors regarding manuscript review feedback is a feasible and essential aspect of the publication process, typically conducted formally via the journal's submission system. It involves professionally addressing reviewers' comments and editor queries. Successful communication necessitates a timely response addressing all points raised by reviewers and the editor. Craft replies that are clear, respectful, and evidence-based, thanking the reviewers and editors for their time and input. Explicitly indicate all changes made to the manuscript within your response document, often using a point-by-point rebuttal format. Avoid confrontational language, even when disagreeing with specific critiques, instead providing reasoned arguments supported by literature. Maintain professional correspondence solely with the editor unless explicitly directed otherwise. Initiate the process by carefully reviewing all feedback and editor summaries. Prepare a detailed, separate response document systematically addressing each comment: summarize the point, state the action taken (revision, argument for retaining original text), and provide specific location markers (e.g., page, line number) for changes made in the revised manuscript. Upload the revised manuscript highlighting changes and the point-by-point response through the journal's portal within the requested timeframe. This structured dialogue demonstrates your commitment to improving your work and directly facilitates the peer review process towards potential publication.