What are the review standards and procedures of the journal?

Journal review entails formal manuscript evaluation through peer review, a standard quality control mechanism where domain experts assess submissions. Editors oversee and decide based on this feedback. The core principles require objective, confidential assessment by independent peer reviewers selected for expertise matching the manuscript's subject. Editorial teams manage the process, ensuring suitability, methodological soundness, originality, significance, and clarity. Standard procedures involve initial editorial screening for scope and format, followed by either direct rejection or confidential peer review. Reviewers provide recommendations (accept, revise, reject), guiding the editor’s decision, which often includes requests for author revisions. Strict adherence to ethics, confidentiality, and reviewer anonymity is paramount. Understanding these standards allows authors to strategically select journals matching their work’s scope and quality. It prepares them for the process, enabling better manuscript preparation to meet quality expectations, informed response to reviewer critiques during revision, and clearer navigation of timelines. This knowledge significantly enhances manuscript acceptance prospects and contributes to advancing rigorous scholarly communication.