How to conduct literature evaluation using Scopus?

Literature evaluation using Scopus employs bibliometric tools to systematically assess publications' relevance and impact. This method leverages citation metrics and filtering capabilities within Scopus for evidence-based analysis. Essential prerequisites include database access and clear research objectives. Key evaluation metrics involve citation counts, h-index, and journal impact metrics. Filter options must be used for refining by publication year, subject area, and document type. Crucially, interpretations must account for disciplinary citation variations and Scopus' coverage strengths in sciences, engineering, and medicine. Conducting it involves these steps: First, perform targeted searches using relevant keywords and Boolean logic. Second, apply Scopus' analysis tools like "Analyze results" to generate metrics and trend visualizations. Third, use citation tracking to identify key authors and highly cited works. Fourth, export data for deeper synthesis. Typical scenarios involve scoping systematic reviews, establishing research baselines, or preparing grant proposals. The method enables swift identification of core publications and trending topics within vast scholarly outputs.