When using AI for writing, how can we ensure the objectivity and neutrality of the thesis?

Ensuring objectivity and neutrality in AI-assisted academic writing is achievable through rigorous human oversight and appropriate processes. AI can be a valuable tool when employed correctly within ethical frameworks. Maintaining objectivity requires critically evaluating AI outputs for inherent biases based on training data or prompt phrasing. Researchers must carefully select objective prompts, avoiding leading language, and meticulously fact-check all generated content against authoritative primary sources and verified data. The scope of AI use must be clearly declared, typically limiting it to drafting assistance or formatting support. Crucially, the researcher bears final responsibility for analysis, interpretation, and argumentation, ensuring neutrality aligns with scholarly standards. Transparent disclosure of AI tool usage is essential. The primary step involves the researcher rigorously reviewing, verifying, and editing all AI contributions against source materials to eliminate bias and inaccuracies. Key implementation focuses on using AI strictly for preliminary drafting or structuring, followed by thorough expert verification. Integrating the AI-generated material into the argument must be done critically. This process, coupled with declared transparency, ensures the final thesis upholds academic objectivity, preserving research integrity and credibility, particularly during peer review.