How to find reviewers for a journal and understand its review criteria?

To identify suitable reviewers and ascertain specific journal review criteria, combine database exploration with analysis of the journal's stated editorial policies and standards. This dual approach ensures alignment with the journal's scholarly scope and evaluation frameworks. Key principles involve leveraging relevant literature databases like Web of Science or Scopus to identify authors publishing in the field. Consult the journal's website thoroughly, examining its aims and scope, instructions for authors, and editorial board expertise. Networking at conferences related to the journal's discipline can yield potential reviewer contacts. Journal editors also often welcome suggestions of qualified reviewers from submitting authors, including reviewers who should be excluded. Always prioritize scholars with established expertise in the specific manuscript topic and a publication record indicating familiarity with the journal's standards. Start by meticulously reviewing the journal's "Instructions for Authors" section, which explicitly outlines submission criteria and often details review focus areas like novelty, methodology, and contribution to the field. Examine previously published articles within the journal to discern common acceptance thresholds and topical preferences. Contact the editorial office directly for clarification if aspects of the review process remain unclear. Utilize authoritative reviewer databases such as Publons or ORCID to locate experts. Ensure proposed reviewers possess relevant publications, have no conflicts of interest, and align with the journal's scope and audience, thereby enhancing the manuscript's chances of acceptance.