Editorial illustration for How to Find the Primary Studies Missing from a Literature Review
Editorial illustration for How to Identify a Defensible Evidence Gap

How to Identify a Defensible Evidence Gap

A defensible evidence gap is not the same thing as a blank search box. It is a specific, bounded statement that the evidence you can actually reach is absent, weak, inconsistent, indirect, or outdated for a defined quest

WisPaper TeamOctober 26, 2026
Editorial illustration for How to Include Null and Negative Findings in an Evidence Summary

How to Include Null and Negative Findings in an Evidence Summary

A null or negative finding is not a gap to be smoothed over—it is a result that changes what your evidence summary can claim. The practical challenge is threefold: find the studies that did not confirm your hypothesis, r

WisPaper TeamOctober 26, 2026
Editorial illustration for How to Keep an Inclusion and Exclusion Log During Fast Screening

How to Keep an Inclusion and Exclusion Log During Fast Screening

Fast screening fails quietly. You read a title, decide "no," and move on — and three weeks later, when your supervisor asks why a paper you cited in your proposal never made it into the review, you cannot reconstruct the

WisPaper TeamOctober 26, 2026
Editorial illustration for How to Link Multiple Papers That Report the Same Study

How to Link Multiple Papers That Report the Same Study

A single trial can surface in your search results as a protocol, a primary outcomes paper, a secondary analysis, a conference abstract, and a long-term follow-up. If you count each as a separate study, your evidence tabl

WisPaper TeamOctober 26, 2026
Editorial illustration for How to Prepare an Evidence Check for a Supervisor Meeting

How to Prepare an Evidence Check for a Supervisor Meeting

An evidence check is a short, structured briefing you bring to a supervision meeting so that you and your supervisor can make decisions about your paper in the time you have. It answers five questions in order: what ques

WisPaper TeamOctober 26, 2026
Editorial illustration for How to Reconcile Conflicting Findings Across Research Papers

How to Reconcile Conflicting Findings Across Research Papers

Two credible papers reach opposite conclusions. Before you write that "the evidence is mixed," treat the disagreement as a diagnostic question: do the studies actually ask the same question of the same people in the same

WisPaper TeamOctober 26, 2026
Editorial illustration for How to Recover Missing Citation Metadata Before Submission

How to Recover Missing Citation Metadata Before Submission

A missing author, a year that changes between versions, or a title that appears in three slightly different forms can stall a reference list right before a deadline. The practical fix is not to guess the missing field. I

WisPaper TeamOctober 26, 2026
Editorial illustration for How to Remove Duplicate References Without Losing Distinct Studies

How to Remove Duplicate References Without Losing Distinct Studies

Duplicate removal in a review is not a single "delete duplicates" click. It is a sequence of decisions that separates three different things: the same record arriving twice from different sources, multiple reports of one

WisPaper TeamOctober 26, 2026
Editorial illustration for How to Replace Weak Secondary Citations with Original Evidence

How to Replace Weak Secondary Citations with Original Evidence

A secondary citation is a claim you are carrying on someone else's authority: a review, guideline, editorial, or textbook says a study found something, and you cite the study without reading it. That shortcut is fine for

WisPaper TeamOctober 26, 2026